User:Jiletka/Bilingual Education/Maria.arguetalandave Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Bilingual education - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Bilingual education - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
1.How much scholarly evidence did the group use on the page? Did they include at least three in-text citations? What was the quality of the references? Were summaries from the reference appropriate? (no plagiarism!) "It appears several updated citations were added, improving and updating the information in the article. Some more in-text citations could have been added in the 'Myths' section to provide more variety of resources. Sources are scholarly articles and peer reviewed. The summaries were well done, there were several quotes that were appropriately cited."2.How effectively did the group incorporate visuals into the page? Did they include at least two images on the page and what was the quality of the images? 3.How well written was the page? Grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure Was the page written in a way that made it accessible for the public? (No jargon)"There is only 1 visual in the page. I can see where appropriate images are difficult to find for this topic. The visual that is incorporated is appropriate for the content. I appreciated the use of bulleted lists in the 'Myths' section as it guided readers to specific myths this topic faces. The writing was easy to follow and understand. The headings needed to be capitalized, I believe, but overall grammar and punctuation all seemed well done."