User:Jiletka/Bilingual Education/PMMorin Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jiletka


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jiletka/Bilingual_Education/Bibliography?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_bibliography


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Bilingual education

Evaluate the drafted changes
1.How much scholarly evidence did the group use on the page?

Jiletka was able to include many sources of evidence. I was not able to access a few of the resources because many of the places I looked for the articles cost money. There were no direct links to a few of the sources. I am not sure if direct links matter or not.

Jiletka included many in-text citations of relevant information that enhanced the article.

Without access to the resources, I was not able to check on all the reference summaries. However, the ones I was able to check did not seem to be plagiarized. Jiletika used a few quotes, which were correctlly cited.

2. How effectively did the group incorporate visuals into the page?

Bilingual education is a hard thing to “catch” in picture form. However, Jiletka was able to include two pictures that portrayed students in bilingual activities. The pictures were clear and added some character to the article.

3.How well written was the page?

The paragraphs were well written. The grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure looked good. I did not see any errors. Jiletka was able to correct a few grammatical errors that were previously in the article. It would be easy for the public to read and understand.

Jiletka’s was able to get rid of nonessential information and make changes that improved the quality of the section.