User:Jimmiejohnsonconfetti/Dallas Jenkins/ForeverButNever Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jimmiejohnsonconfetti


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Jimmiejohnsonconfetti/Dallas Jenkins
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Dallas Jenkins

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall, the contributions that were added in their edit are very articulate, and provide something to the article that wasn't there previously, which makes it valuable. Additionally, the information is highly pertinent to the information surrounding it in the article. As far as suggestions go, it's hard to pinpoint anything that wasn't already done in their contribution, as it is already very well done as it is. It does, however, make me wish that those who have previously contributed to the article that I have chosen were equally articulate.