User:Jimmygotclass/Geneva Conventions/Maxmcq11 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Jimmygotclass
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jimmygotclass/sandbox

Lead evaluation
The Lead to the article has not been changed or updated. The Lead that was written already is concise and describes an overview of the article's topic and brief description of the major sections of the article. I thought the Lead was not overly detailed, but included a good amount of external links as well as information.

Content evaluation
There was no added content. The content that is there though, is solid, and uses-to-date sources. The content was very informative though.

Tone and balance evaluation
The tone was very neutral, there were no biased claims, overrepresented viewpoints, or persuasion in the section.

Sources and references evaluation
Yes, the sources not only work when I clicked on them, but they are relevant and reliable as well. These sources choses reflect the article's topic as well, with works from multiple different authors.

Organization evaluation
The content written, was clear and easy to read. There were zero grammatical mistakes that I could find, and the section was organized into sections and written well.

Images and media evaluation
There was not an image added, but the images on the article already are great.

Overall evaluation
The information that is in the section, is very strong and great quality. I am just having a hard time figuring out what you edited, though. The section in your sandbox is the exact same as the actual article's section "Right to a Fair Trial When no Crime is Alleged" already, so there has been no change except for the number of the sources. The section is good and well written, it would be nice to be able to see what you individually added to it though.

~