User:Jimmyjon12/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Environmental science

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I have a background in environmental science, so I should be fairly qualified to evaluate it.

Evaluate the article
Upon a first look, everything in the article seems to be in the right place. I don't see anything that shouldn't be on this page.

Environmental science is very broad. There's a lot that could be added to this page such as concepts like environmental justice. The references seem up to date. Some are older than 10 years, but they appear to still be relevant.

Most of this article focuses on the United States' policies, so I think there's some bias there. I think it could be broadened to include a global perspective.

All the links work and are associated with a fact. All of the sources appear unbiased since they are textbooks or governmental websites. The diversity of the websites could be improved. Most are government websites and 2 are used for the same fact.

Wikipedia has listed it as a level 5 vital article and class C wikiproject. On the talk page, people agree that it is a very USA focused page and that the study of Environmental science goes back father than NEPA.