User:Jimmypotter4/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article

 * The heading is good and gives ample amount of clarification and information about what is going on.
 * The content seems very good.
 * Neutral tone and very informative. May seem like it’s trying to persuade due to the lack of representation in the real situations and focusing on hoaxes.
 * It provides a picture of a “Hurricane Shark” that is a hoax and they clarify that.


 * Would be better if the real events of this happening were in the beginning and the hoaxes should be in the end. Along with the “In popular culture “ section.
 * Sources are abundant and are reliable (No academic sources but used what they had)
 * C class article ( low importance)
 * Not much on the talk page
 * Balance is okay. There are more hoaxes than real situations in the article.
 * Organization could use some work: Should have shortened the part where it talks about the other events that the picture showed up from. Ex.) Osama Binladin
 * Should have gone more in depth on a few examples instead of fully explaining all of the examples.
 * Only one picture for evidence and a linked video, should have more pictures and videos for the other alleged examples.
 * Overall Impression : It was interesting to see the hurricane shark and its pretty funny to read about when there is a bug flood no matter what it is very likely that the famous picture of the hurricane shark pops up.