User:Jimurano/Jacopo Pesaro being presented by Pope Alexander VI to Saint Peter/Jimurano Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Jacopo Pesaro being presented by Pope Alexander VI to Saint Peter (Not assigned to AH352 students)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Jacopo Pesaro being presented by Pope Alexander VI to Saint Peter

Lead
==== Lead evaluation: Lead introduced the historical background in which the work was created. It clearly states the basic information of the artwork, and provides a context. It did not list the sections of the article, but it connects to the content smoothly because there are only a few sections. ====

Content
==== Content evaluation: The content is certainly related to the topic and is very informative. It's mostly a formal analysis that introduces different components of the artwork. It presents the narration of the painting in a clear manner and makes remarks on a various of details, which help readers to understand the story. More content beside formal analysis would elevate the article to a higher level: artist's techniques, painting's relevance to its time and its reception. These insightful yet neutral points will bring more depth to the article. ====

==== Tone and balance evaluation: neutral and unbiased. And the length of different sections are well-proportioned. Most of the content is on the painting itself, and the editor also adds dating history and provenance, which are a good supplement to the body text. ====

Sources and References
==== Sources and references evaluation: The editors used 17 references in this short article, showing extensive research into this topic. Their claims are properly backed up by reliable sources, which could be checked via the links at the bottom. The references also showed quite a diversity. ====

Images and Media
==== Images and media evaluation: I'm uncertain whether the picture adheres to Wikipedia's copyright regulation, but the editors certainly provided pictures that could help readers understand the painting more precisely. Editors upload a full image of the painting and two detail images, and all three images are of high definition. They correspond to the topics discussed in the article. ====

Overall impressions
==== Overall evaluation: a well written article that provides a very informative facts on the painting. More contents beside formal analysis will provide a greater insight on the importance and relevance of this painting throughout history. ====