User:Jiselle04/Gender-critical feminism/Jlopez04 Peer Review

General info
Jiselle04
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Jiselle04/Gender-critical feminism
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Gender-critical feminism

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

After reviewing contributions to the article thus far I would say that the content that was added was relevant to the topic and subtopics as remained neutral for a majority of the information. Additionally, the use of reliable sources if prominent throughout the entirety of the article as all new information is followed by the citation. As I am also editing an article within the topic of feminism I was able to gain more insights on different aspects of feminism and gender which helps me understand more of what I am reading and editing within my article. The inclusion of the information also follows a very well organized structure there a clear sections that have information that fits well within that sub topic. The grammar looks good for the most part as well and is easy to understand for those who may not have much knowledge on the topic. Overall, the edits made to the article have tremendously improved the quality of the article and strengthened the information that was previously included.