User:Jjcarhar2024/Poverty reduction/Iddibass123 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info
The person I'm reviewing is Jjcarhar2024

User:Jjcarhar2024/sandbox - Wikipedia

 LEAD 

Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content evaluation
The content is good, it's up tp date. All is talks about is the solutions and what happens as a result of poverty.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:

Tone and balance evaluation
The draft is neutral, there is no biased statement. He explains the benefits of the solution to Poverty and then tells us as a result what

happens.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:

Sources and references evaluation
All of his sources are thorough and they are all up-to-date, The latest his sources go back to is 2016. They are all different websites and not from the same or similar source.

Organization
Guiding questions:

Organization evaluation
The way he organize his draft is with stating his topic sentence which introduces what Poverty is and what happens when it occurs. Which is a good way to start his draft. Then he continues to organize his paragraph in a simple way. He states a solution and then beneficial factor of what happens when as a result. He states three of these examples.

Images and Media
Guiding questions:

Images and media evaluation
There's no images.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall evaluation
Overall, I think the draft was good but I think his points could've been stronger. they sounded a little bit weak and too simple. They were a few sentence fragments and misspelled words. But I did understand what he was trying to say.