User:Jjlord/sandbox

bold bold bold

Botany

 * There are many references from different sources
 * All the facts have appropriate references
 * The article is well organized with headings and subheadings as well as a functional table of contents
 * The article is neutral
 * There are appropriate links to relevant topics

Cyanobacteria

 * There are occasional facts that should have a citation
 * There are a lot of references and variety in sources
 * The headings are well organized
 * The article is neutral with the exception of the dietary supplementation section that focuses on the good that they do and don't talk about the consequences other than saying "Despite the associated toxins"
 * There are a few issues with wording and sentences not making full sense

Pinophyta

 * There are many facts that don't have citations on them
 * There are a reasonable amount of references but not as many as the other articles
 * The article is neutral and gives clear facts
 * There is a lot of discussion about some of the facts that are unclear