User:Jjohns34/Education policy/Tshwanelo maruping Peer Review

General info
(provide username) User: Jjohn34
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Creating User:Jjohns34/Education policy/Tshwanelo maruping Peer Review - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * it does not exists:

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead had been updated to reflect the new content. It includes an introductory sentence that concisely and it describes the article topic well. The article seems to not include a brief description of the major sections. No, the article only presents the information that is presented in the article

The article does not show the added information, but the content is relevant to the topic. The content is up to date. There is no content that is missing and everything falls perfectly to its content. Yes, it addresses the topic of education policy. The content is neural throughout the article and easy to understand. I have not noticed any heavily bias content towards particular position which makes it a good article. All viewpoints are presented well especially education reform in the United States. The content persuades the reader in a favor of one position

Yes, I checked that all content is backed up by reliable secondary source of information. Yes, the sources reflect the available literature on the topic and some of the sources are current like the education policy source. Yes, the sources are written by the diverse spectrum of authors. Yes, the is a better source available such as peer reviewed article by Roumell, Elizabeth Anne; Salajan, Florin D, Tonoran, Corina (July 2020) and all the links I checked works.