User:Jjw21/Dog skin disorders/Ekzielke Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jjw21


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Sandbox: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jjw21/Dog_skin_disorders?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Bibliography: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jjw21/Dog_skin_disorders/Bibliography?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_bibliography


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Dog skin disorders

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)


 * The lead is short, sweet, and to the point, but I feel like it needs to be a complete sentence.
 * I feel like the content is very good, and I can't believe she already added it to the article. If it's still up and no one has edited it yet, then I'd say most people agree with what she added to the article.
 * The content is very neutral and is a good summary to the article.
 * The sentence definitely adds to the article because there is not a lot of information on ring worms, so this information is necessary and builds with the article.
 * I also like how the sources are organized in the bibliography, it has the APA citations and the URL.
 * Furthermore, the citations in the Wikipedia article, Dog skin disorders are correct and they are placed in the reference as well.