User:Jkb0001/Malingering of post-traumatic stress disorder/Positive not popular pysch Peer Review

General info
Jkb0001
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing User:Jkb0001/Malingering of post-traumatic stress disorder:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists) Article:

Lead

 * No changes regarding the lead have been made, the lead as it stands is weak but acceptable, but does not reflect any contribution or information on the author's part.
 * The current lead is strangely about the actual diagnosis of PTSD primarily, only mentioning the malingering of PTSD in the last 3 words. I would immediately reevaluate the nature of the lead and refocus it towards the actual effect of malingering of PTSD as opposed to PTSD itself.

Content

 * The content added consists of a single edit. The single edit is fine, but this does not constitute a significant enough change at this stage in my opinion.
 * After reading the existing article, I would suggest adding new sections to the article to make your content more organized as you work through the writing process.

Tone and Balance

 * The information is neutral, again owing to the lack of it as it is just a single edit.
 * I do not feel like there were enough edits made to the existing article for me to be able to judge the tone and balance accurately. The existing article is only three paragraphs right now, but they do sound like they provide an unbiased overview of the topic.

Sources and References

 * The single edit is backed up by a source. That source seems to be up-to-date from what I can tell.
 * There are no images in the article, adding some helpful diagrams or other images would help readers better understand the topic.
 * I would add at least two or three images to the existing article asap. There were three wikilinks in the lead, but I would try to link the content in the second/third paragraphs to other wikpedia articles as well.