User:Jkb0001/Malingering of post-traumatic stress disorder/PsychgirlTYTY Peer Review

General info
(jkb0001) Malingering of post-traumatic stress disorder
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Editing User:Jkb0001/Malingering of post-traumatic stress disorder - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Malingering of post-traumatic stress disorder - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

The lead has some small changes or edits but not heavily updated. The lead is neutral and concise however, my suggestion would make more edits. It is possible that they can improve the article by changing or adding on the first introductory sentences.

Content:

The editor made small changes to the additional information. I wish that there were more edits to make the content a tad stronger. The content addressed the information in a neutral light. It is not persuading one ideology over another. I feel like that is a very nice touch to add while reviewing this article.

'''Tone and Balance: The tone is very easy and informative. I wish that the claims had more information or different types of viewpoints. But it is a high possblity that the information on the topic just wasn't enough to create that amount of information.'''

Sources and References: There are a variety of sources from the past and present. I feel that is a good mix to portray the information that the editor wants to have shown. My suggestion is to check if there are more secondary sources than primary because that is a hard change if it has this issue.

Overall Impressions : I really like the length of the article. It is very easy to follow and very quick and straight to the point. I wish there was a tad more information due to the others submitted by our classmates. I wish that I edited more too due to this fact. I would suggest making sure there is no grammar issues and primary sources. That is the true key even though I do not personally see grammatical errors.