User:Jkim777/Myxococcus xanthus/Agam Horowitz Peer Review

General info
Jkim777, Sam Ball, Clairegriffin8, Oliviasc0203
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Jkim777/Myxococcus xanthus
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Myxococcus xanthus
 * Myxococcus xanthus

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead is mostly well-written and concisely summarizes main points that are covered in the article, but I would recommend adding a sentence summarizing the "Metabolism" section as this is not addressed in the lead. In terms of the section organization, I like the specificity of each section title and overall organization. I would suggest either moving the "Morphology" section (under "Microbiology") into the "Motility" section (under "Complex Behaviors"), or rearranging the information in some way so M. xanthus 's movement methods are not repeated. In terms of content, source 5 used in the addition of the "Morphology" section is dated back to 1941, so I would recommend looking further for new information or cross-referencing that source with newer sources to ensure that the data is still widely accepted. I like the plethora of sources used throughout the article, showing a variety of covered viewpoints and neutrality within the tone of the information. The "Microbiology" section added is written well, but is heavily sourced from source number 6. I would recommend incorporating information from a couple different sources in this section to ensure that the information included is unbiased and accepted by many different peer-reviewed papers. Overall, the additions are improving the article and are grammatically correct.