User:Jkim777/Myxococcus xanthus/Atle5163 Peer Review

General info
Jkim777
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Jkim777/Myxococcus xanthus
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Myxococcus xanthus

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: There isn't much change between the original article's lead and this draft, but the small addition of general information on the bacteria's characteristics was good to include! I think the only thing missing from the lead that would be beneficial to add is maybe an overview of the following topics within the article, like introducing them and the topics you're going to talk about that are significant to the bacteria.

Content/Sources/Tone: I noticed the new content on morphology, metabolism, and environment appear to be relevant to the article and up-to-date. I'm not sure if it's required to include a reference for every sentence with new information, but most of the citations/references are at the end of each paragraph and that might be worth looking into to revise. I also don't recognize any bias in the tone which is great! It's veery neutral and strictly informational! The rearrangement of sections is more organized as well.

Wish I had more time to evaluate it more, but overall I think this is great progress!