User:Jkim777/Myxococcus xanthus/Michael55cm Peer Review

Good lead that summarizes the basic information of the microbe, and has multiple sources supporting the presented information.

In the metabolism section, all of the information comes from a single source, it could be beneficial to gather one or two more sources that support the stated information.

One paragraph in colony growth section doesn’t have a cited source to support the claim. Multiple paragraphs in the motility section don’t have sources cited either.

I’m seeing a lot of sections at the end of the article that have whole paragraphs of information but no citation provided

The overall organization is good, and the tone is kept neutral throughout the article. The sources that have been added to the article are reliable and most have been published within the las 10 years.

Great work, just work on adding sources for information without citations.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)