User:Jkloop12

I have (1982-present) lived a life filled with excitement. I moved straight into the army before I even got out of high school. After 6 years of that, I started my life in business. Moving up one position at a time, I worked hard to become a supervisor. Getting into management, I started to think I needed more to work with. So here I am, working hard again to get my AAT. This is just the start. From what I see this is going to be a challenge, but only good things will come out of it.

Here on Wikipedia I am looking forward to what will come out of an ever changing informational world. I feel that Wikipedia is quickly becoming a place to find information on the Web. To overlook the dangers of information sharing like this would be foolish, but over time I see it only getting better. I am looking forward to what I may find and what I may contribute.

Article Critique
I was thinking of how I enjoyed engine and all the parts that made them work. I visited the Crankshaft page on Wikipedia, and found three aspects of it worth Commenting on: no citations in lead, time stated as older times, and undue weight.

The lead is itself a layout for the page some may think a citation our two are not needed that is not what I think. The biggest thing about the lead is the complex way that it is stated. In every aspect they would only help to describe the article. I’m shore you can till I think there should be some.

As you move throw Internal combustion engines portion on this article you see the information is stated with open comments instead of dates. The information will be better stated with a time stamp or “time frame” you may say. There would be more information in an article on Internal Combustion Engines.

A few notes on undue weight. If we look at this article we can take out and more to keep it from get out of control. Start with the first sentence of the head Internal Combustion Engines with the heading and adding the rest to the lead. Then remove the headings Piston Stroke and Engine configuration these headings will be better suited in the article Internal Combustion Engine.

Over all I think the article was informative and was a good read. The layout had many headings and a clear point. The critiques I am making are only to do my part in clarifying the information and starting the format. The three aspects that I despite to comment on are a small number of things that can be found if we look hard at Wikipedia and only a small part of what it takes to put together and maintain a large information .com like this one.