User:Jlc223/James A. Champy/LiamWooten Peer Review

My classmate has update the Lead section to include new material that they have added to the article, and the included information is neutral in tone and objective in nature. It is sourced appropriately.

I believe the information added to the content sections is relevant, but the positioning of the additional content might want to be considered to flow purposes. This informtation is also neutral in tone and objective in nature.

Aside from existing language that could be re-evaluated ("nowadays" in Content paragraph 3), style looks good and consistent with existing article.

Overall, great additions so far. Only recommendation would be to continue on with current trajectory and add more information as is necessary.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)