User:Jlg4947/Gonococcemia/DPrinceDO Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jlg4947

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:


 * The lead has been updated with the content that the user has added. Could use a line about treatment.
 * lead is clear and concise with a good introductory sentence.

Content:


 * Content is up-to-date and relevant to the topic.
 * I do not thing there is any content that needs to be added or removed.

Tone and Balance:


 * The article is well balanced between its different sections.
 * The tone is neutral and does not appear to try and influence the reader.

Sources and References:


 * The sources are current.
 * All of the new material that has been add appears to be backed up by sources.
 * Sources come from peer reviewed journals and one from the CDC which is a reputable source.
 * All the links in the sources work.

Organization:


 * The added content is clear, easy to read, and well organized.

Images and Media:


 * No images or media has been added to this point but the work is ongoing so they may plan to add some.

Overall Impression:


 * The added content has improved the article significantly.
 * Great statistics in the epidemiology section.
 * A few images might help the article.

DPrinceDO (talk) 21:49, 11 November 2021 (UTC)