User:Jlpowell5/Parasocial interaction/NicoleCastigs17 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * Jlpowell5
 * Jacob Powell
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * User:Jlpowell5/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * No.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * No, the lead section of Jacob's article was not changed. Only content was added.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * No.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * No.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, three sections were added. Ethnocentrism and PSI, along with Humanization of Brand Personalities and The Effects of Credibility on PSI (Social Media).
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes, the most recent source Jacob added was from 2019.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * No, everything that was added as content flows with the PSI theory.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes, no phrases such as "most people" or "while it's obvious that x, some insist that y."
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No. The content is neutral.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes. Everything that was added was directly sited.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes. All sources have to do with covering some aspect of PSI theory.
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes, the oldest source was from five years ago in 2013.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes, all sources work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes, the quotes that were added when helping explain the content added were easy to read and understand.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No, there are no visible grammatical or spelling errors.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes, there are three main content sections that make up Jacob's wiki draft. All of which are important aspects of PSI theory that are well broken down.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * No.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * No, there are no images.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * No.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * No.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Yes, I think this is great information that could be added to the actual PSI wiki article. Especially, the social media content that Jacob added in.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * Jacob did a really good job of adding exact quotes from the sources he found that related to PSI theory. It really helped breakdown the overall meaning of the content sections he added.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * If Jacob were to improve his draft, I would say he can add a little more to the lead section to give a clear understanding of what PSI theory actually is.