User:Jlsenn/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Equestrian

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I am knowledgeable about this field and wanted to see how clear and factual this information is.



Evaluate the article
 Lead Section 


 * Provides definition but could go into more detail about what all is considered to be "equestrian" such as the various disciplines
 * Too short; not enough information

 Content 


 * Gives bullet points of examples
 * More detail would be beneficial
 * Good variety but no real weight to the information
 * Little to no information about this topic

 Tone and Balance 


 * No tone as the wiki page is too short and too little information

 Sources and References 


 * No sources section, but links provides throughout the page.
 * Essential seems to be a page to link you to other pages with actual information
 * If this wiki page should stay on Wiki, I believe it should be able to stand alone and have actual content, rather than only string into other Wiki pages

 Organization and Writing Quality 


 * Very straight forward and organized as expected
 * Good use of bullet points, but sub-categories could also be useful
 * No outline
 * Only 3 categories

 Images and Media 


 * No images or media directly on this page
 * Could be beneficial to help one understand the idea

 Talk Page Discussion 


 * Only links have been added
 * No actual talking points
 * Is within the WikiProject Disambiguation

 Overall Impressions 


 * Needs a LOT of work if it is to stand alone as a wiki page
 * When researching on Wiki, it seems that other equestrian pages are more beneficial and provide much more detail-if so, why have another page talking about the same thing?
 * Overall, article needs work if it is to remain as a stand-alone
 * Last edited in 2010
 * Article is not near completion; poorly developed and needs to be redone for better education of the sport

jlsenn~