User:Jm4alfred/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
I am Evaluating the article on Emperor of Mexico,

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose the article on the Emperor of Mexico, because I thought it was a an interesting subject. However, I thought that it was very short, and gave a very general overview to an extent that its not quit correct.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article has 3 sections- An overview, the First Mexican Empire & The Second Mexican Empire.

 Issue with the overview 

The first section provides a summary of the timeframes of the two emperors and end in describing how they were both overthrown and executed, however only very vaguely covers the material, giving an incomplete overview of both of their rule. The section ends with a description "In both instances of Empire, the reigning Emperor was forcibly deposed and then executed.". For the case of Agustín de Iturbide, the overview misses an important detail that he was first exiled, and killed after coming back- which tells an entirely different story to what the article entails.

 Issue with Section "First Mexican Empire (1821–1823)": 

The second section titled "First Mexican Empire (1821–1823)", only provides a link to another Wikipedia article, and a chart showing general information like date of birth, date of rule & date of death. It also briefly describes his "decreed on June 22, 1822", but doesn't describe what they were.

Issue with Section: "Second Mexican Empire (1863–1867)":

The Third section entirely misses out on information of origin of Maximilian I of Mexico, as a Habsburg seated by European Powers.

Issue with Sources:

The Sources on the bottom of the page don't work