User:Jmack2214/Slow violence/Niamh Calder Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jmack2214


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Slow violence
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
In the first paragraph, there are good definitions used to describe slow violence. I like the way you connect social inequality to slow violence. Perhaps a specific example to demonstrate your point would enhance the connection. The article's format is well thought out, and your subheadings are concise. I like that you have highlighted the varying definitions of slow violence. It is clear that there is not one but multiple meanings to the term and that not all academics agree on how to define slow violence. Your subheadings and some of your content were related to the topic and provided a thorough analysis of slow violence. The sources that I checked seemed to all be relevant and correctly cited.

The petrochemical infrastructure section is very clear and concise. However, I found the Indigenous Reserve 12 section to be a bit confusing because it covers many complex topics. Also, I believe neo-colonialism is a more suitable term than modern-day colonialism.

Women and slow violence is an interesting topic, and I would have liked to have read more about the connection between slow violence and its impact on women. The section on women and slow violence is more relevant to the topic than counter-violence.

Overall, I enjoyed reading your article and learning about slow violence!