User:Jmk12/Copy editing/Logan Picunko Peer Review

General info
JMK12
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Copy Editing

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

The lead is really dense and lengthy, cataloguing the numerous nuances of the field and the ways it differs from country to country. To be frank, adding anything more to this lead would be nigh impossible, so I understand you leaving it alone.

Content:

I think that your proposed edits will work perfectly in the article. I think adding a values section to the article can definitely help explain the nuances and standards that Copy Editing is held to. I do think you should be careful about how you go about explaining that knowledge in statistics can lbe helpful in copy edititing, as it could get flagged as personal research and not hold up under Wikipedia guidelines.

Tone and Balance:

I trust your ability to remain neutral in a topic such as copy editing

Sources and References:

You seem to have some reliable and effective sources to draw from.

Organization:

I think your outline on how you intend to edit the article is well thought out. Just be careful around creating a whole new section, as it can possibly disrupt the flow of the article if it does not have enough information.

Overall Impression:

I don't have much to go off of, as I have had some difficulty in accessing your sandbox edits. However, I get the impression that you are knowledgable in your field and understand what specifically you wish to add and what you wish to leave as-is.