User:Jmlslleon/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.) Cognitive archaeology

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

It is closely related to archeology, which we are learning in class.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Yes, everything is relevant to the topic.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? No, nothing is out of date.
 * Can you identify any notable equity gaps? Does the article underrepresent or misrepresent historically marginalized populations? There is no equity gaps.
 * What else could be improved? There can be more content for the history part.


 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Yes, the article is neutral.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? The history part is a little bit underrepresented.


 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Yes the links work. And the sources do support the claims.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? The sources are from academic papers, which have their own perspective but neutral in general.
 * Do the sources come from a diverse array of authors and publications? Yes, the sources are diverse.