User:Jmo291/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coco_(2017_film)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I am an avid fan of Pixar movies and Coco was one of my favorite movies growing up. This is an important article to people who want to learn more about animated movies produced by Pixar/Disney. My preliminary impression of the article was that it was very incomplete as there were still many signs of editing taking place.

Evaluate the article
The lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic. The lead includes a brief description of the article's major sections. The lead does not include information that is not present in the article. The lead is concise.

The article's content is relevant to the topic as it discusses the voice actor of Ernesto de la Cruz, who is the main antagonist of the movie, but it does run off in a tangent in certain points of the article such as the discussion of Conan. The content is up-to-date as it refers to sources from 2021 and older. This article has encapsulated the the main entirety of Coco including the plot of the story, the acclaim and criticism it received, and the controversies surrounding the movie. It does address equity gaps by discussing the inspiration for Mama Coco, which came from a small village in Michoacán.

The article is neutral and maintains an objective stance on the movie Coco. There are no claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position. There are no viewpoints that overrepresent or underrepresented.

All the facts in the article are backed by a reliable secondary source of information. They are written by a diverse spectrum of authors such as USAToday, Telemundo, and Mexico Daily News. The sources are current as they date to the year of 2021 or older. The links attached to the references work.

The article is well-written and it is concise, clear, and easy to read. The article has little to no grammatical or spelling errors. The article is well-organized with different sections such as plot, criticism, cast, etc.

The article contains images of the movie cover as well as some of the people involved in the production of the movie. The images are well-captioned. They are placed next to the section of words that correlates with the image.

I believe this article is very well-rounded as it discusses the aspects of the movie storyline as well as the impact in had in the film industry. It can be improved by the addition of novel findings made in 2022, which may be inserted into the article for further relevance.