User:Jmurdock6/Edwin Locke/JohnsWiki2023 Peer Review

Hello Okrowe,

Below is what I posted in the Discussion on Blackboard last week. It looks like everything has remained about the same on your Bibliography and Sandbox, which is fine. I just wanted to post this so you can see what I wrote, and hopefully help a little in editing your Article. I don't really know how many times we have exchange Peer Reviews, so I will check on this page every now and then to see if you have commented. Then if you need any help or want me to help review anything, just let me know, and I'd be happy too!

Disscussion Board:

Edwin Locke’s:

Bibliography – Looks like Jmurdock6 has not completed this section of the assignment or has it saved somewhere else, so I am going to skip over this review for now, and then comment below if we can get together on where the Bibliography for Locke is.

Sandbox – Sandbox looks great! I think the only thing to keep in mind is that these are recommended to be small edits at a time. So, maybe break it up when transferring it over to Locke’s actual article and it should be good. The other thing would maybe include the International Standard Book Number (ISBN) to the books you have listed. I will be honest, I don’t know how the editors before me did it, but if you go to “John Kotter” Wikipedia article, the ISBNs have links to the book themselves, which is pretty cool…  but like I said, I have no clue how they did that.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)