User:Jn156249/sandbox

My article topic is the installment of Cash-for-Grades Programs towards low-income schools in the United States. In my article that I have chosen, it explains programs similar to this one; however, it is explained globally and not just in the United States. Some things might distract me, like other countries that were provided, because I only need information about the U.S.

The article seems neutral throughout the text, I don't really see any claims or frames towards a particular position. The author(s) only stated facts and defined specific terms.

No, not that I can point out. None of the viewpoints seem to be over/underrepresented.

Yes, all of the links that I have checked works. The sources do support the claims in the article, some contain the definition stated.

Yes, most of the facts are referenced with an appropriate reliable reference. The information appears to come from multiple articles and books online. A reference that I did find biased was noted. But some references repeat themselves.

I found that there was a citation missing that could've been added. Most of the information are up to date, the page was last edited on November 16 2017.

Not much is said, but the people that have commented wrote their response in the year 2011. They said that the article was in need of an update due to some existing programs that were removed and others that were added. Another person also advised to cite some of the information from a specific article.

The article is rated as start class, which means it has plenty of room for improvement. I can't find it, but I don't think it's part of any WikiProjects.

The way that Wikipedia discusses the topic is more bullet point formatted, where as in the way we've talked about it in class was in an essay format.