User:Jnaidoo03/Dumile Feni/Slightlyplus Peer Review

General info
Jnaidoo03
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Jnaidoo03/Dumile Feni
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Dumile Feni

Evaluate the drafted changes
I think overall the information given in the Lead section of the article was good, however it could be broken down into other sections. It gave an overview of what the article will be about, but there was a lot of detail that could be placed later in the article. In comparison to the currently published version of the article I believe you have some key pieces of information that could be added to the existing piece.

The content you have so far is good. I understand that there is already info on the existing article but I think it would be good to try and add more to your article in order to make the finalized one more informative. There really wasn't much to read other than the Lead, but like I said before that can easily be broken down into other sections.

Your article was neutral and did not feel like it was pandering to any specific side. The only thing I have to say is the phrase "forced to" might be taken as negative so it is up to you if you want to change it.

As for the references I think there was an issue when you were putting them in. There are five links in the references sections but only two citation pop ups in the article itself. The Collections, Exhibitions, and Awards sections do not have any citations in them. Looking through the available links I was able to find where you got the information for the Exhibitions section. Also, citation number 3 has a broken link where you are unable to access the website because it split apart.

But overall I think what you have so far is good and there just needs to be a bit more information so readers can learn more about Dumile Feni is as a person! Good Job!