User:Jnashl24/Escherichia virus T4/Lilsharplilac Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * I am reviewing Jnashl24's article contributions
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Jnashl24/Escherichia virus T4

Lead

 * The information in the user's page has not been added into the article yet, so the lead has not been altered.

Content

 * The added content is clear and acceptable for this article. They expanded upon the genome, translation, virus particle structure, and transcription.

Tone and Balance
The content that was added is neutral. There are no claims that are biased toward a particular position. There is no claim that persuades the reader in a certain direction.

Sources and References
The content is backed up by a reliable source. The source is very thorough and reflects the amount of literature on this certain topic. The source is from 2003, so it is about 17 years old. It is relatively current. The links for the source works.

Organization
The new content is well-written and concise. There is a lot of information given, but the user does a wonderful job of outlining the sections. There are no grammatical or spelling errors in the additions.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
I think that the added content improved the overall quality of the article. The strengths are found in the amount of information added. The user added 4 sections to the article that are highly descriptive and well-written. The content can be improved by adding another source or two to the additions.