User:Jnelso95/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title:
 * Dajti Castle
 *  Article Evaluation: 
 * Lead Section:
 * Good introduction of content, yet kind of a bland read. Does not really give any introduction to the content within the article.
 * Content:
 * Content is relevant to the topic, yet seems to be lacking in the section about architecture. Article was last edited in February of 2022.
 * Tone and Balance:
 * Nothing of concern, all looks good
 * Sources:
 * Only 5 sources, although information presented in the article is supported by sources. Links work but are very slow.
 * Organization & Writing Quality:
 * Organized well. Writing is done well.
 * Images and Media:
 * Only one image included, could use more to emphasize statements in the article.
 * Talk Page Discussion:
 * Talk page only discusses the addition of links made recently.
 * Overall Impressions:
 * Article was good but could definitely use more information.
 * Sources
 * Besnik Aliaj, Keida Lulo, Genc Myftiu - TIRANA, the Challenge of Urban Development (Archaeological evidence in Tirana district, page 133) Publisher: SEDA, Tirana 2003 ISBN 99927-880-0-3
 * ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h
 * ^
 * ^ Municipality of Tirana: History of Tirana
 * ^ Fjalori Enciklopedik Shqiptar, Akademia e Shkencave – Tiranē, 1984 (DAJTI, page 166 (in Albanian))
 * ^ Municipality of Tirana: History of Tirana
 * ^ Fjalori Enciklopedik Shqiptar, Akademia e Shkencave – Tiranē, 1984 (DAJTI, page 166 (in Albanian))

Option 2

 * Article title:
 * Jacobean architecture
 * Article Evaluation
 * Lead Section:
 * Well written introduction, describes content in article.
 * Content:
 * Content is relevant to article, but sort of draws on tangents from the architecture. Up to date: September 2022
 * Tone and Balance:
 * Nothing of Concern
 * Sources:
 * Article has a very small amount of references, could definitely use more, less broad references.
 * Organization & Writing Quality:
 * Well organized, easy to follow.
 * Images and Media:
 * Good number of images used.
 * Talk Page Discussion:
 * Talk page discusses previous mistakes in article.
 * Overall Impressions:
 * Good article, not to intrigued about the topic.
 * Sources:
 * Marcus Whiffen, An Introduction to Elizabethan and Jacobean Architecture (1952).
 * J. Summerson, Architecture in Britain, 1530–1830 (rev. ed. 1963).
 * The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition. 2001.
 * J. Summerson, Architecture in Britain, 1530–1830 (rev. ed. 1963).
 * The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition. 2001.

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Bayeux Cathedral
 * Article Evaluation
 * Lead Section:
 * Lead section was informative of information presented in the article. Last Updated August 2022
 * Content:
 * Content was very informative, but once again lacking in the architecture description.
 * Tone and Balance:
 * No Issues here.
 * Sources:
 * No references at all, just external links.
 * Organization & Writing Quality:
 * Well organized, writing quality seemed alright.
 * Images and Media:
 * Included many images, almost more images than the content.
 * Talk Page Discussion:
 * Talks about the lack of references.
 * Overall Impressions:
 * Article looks impressive, but cannot be validated because of lack of references.
 * Sources:
 * None, just external links.
 * Sources:
 * None, just external links.

Option 4

 * Article title
 * All Saints' Church, Tianjin
 * Article Evaluation
 * Lead Section:
 * Lead section lacks discussing the content of the article, very short.
 * Content:
 * Content sticks to its history and appearance in films, no reference to the architecture.
 * Tone and Balance:
 * No issues here.
 * Sources:
 * Links all work, however sources are all in foreign languages. Cannot tell how accurate information is.
 * Organization & Writing Quality:
 * Well done.
 * Images and Media:
 * Some images, could use more.
 * Talk Page Discussion:
 * Nothing in the talk page whatsoever.
 * Overall Impressions:
 * Interesting article, however there was nothing related to architecture of the church at all.
 * Sources:
 * ^
 * ^ Jump up to:a b
 * ^
 * ^
 * (Won't show when copied for some reason)
 * ^
 * ^
 * (Won't show when copied for some reason)

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Mather Tower
 *  Article Evaluation: 
 * Lead Section:
 * The entire article is a "Lead Section". Whole article is confined to one section (multiple paragraphs).
 * Content:
 * Discusses the history of the building and its structure. Whole thing is very broad, could use much more detail. Updated September 2022
 * Tone and Balance:
 * Nothing of concern
 * Sources:
 * Good number of references, links work.
 * Organization & Writing Quality:
 * Organization was bland, could be made more in depth and organized better.
 * Images and Media:
 * Only one image, could use more of construction.
 * Talk Page Discussion:
 * Discusses the link modification.
 * Overall Impressions:
 * Article was short, could use much more info.
 * Sources:
 * The Mather Tower. Essential American Architecture. Archived 2010-09-17 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 2010-08-09.
 * ^ Jump up to:a b c d McBrien, Judith Paine. Pocket Guide to Chicago Architecture. (Norton, 2004). ISBN 0-393-73155-3. Retrieved 2010-08-09.
 * ^ Construction Begins on Mather Tower Cupola. Emporis Retrieved 2010-08-09.
 * ^ Mather Tower image compilation. [1][dead link] Retrieved August 23, 2016.
 * ^
 * ^ "National Trust Presents National Preservation Honor Award to Mather Tower in Chicago" (Press release). National Trust for Historic Preservation. 2006-11-02. Retrieved 2006-11-06.
 * ^
 * ^ "National Trust Presents National Preservation Honor Award to Mather Tower in Chicago" (Press release). National Trust for Historic Preservation. 2006-11-02. Retrieved 2006-11-06.