User:Jnelso95/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Category:C-Class Architecture articles, 4 World Trade Center

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I choose this article due to my interest in the architecture of the 4 World Trade Center.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead Section:


 * Includes introduction sentence that describes the title of the article.
 * Includes a content table listing the names of the sections in the article
 * Does not include any information that is not included in the article

Content:


 * Article has relevant content to the topic
 * Article is up to date (Last Edited September 15, 2022)
 * Content all seems in place, nothing that shouldn't belong minus maybe the tenants.
 * Article deals with some background on 9/11/01, and how the history of the building came to.

Tone and Balance


 * The article seems very neutral, there is lack of any topics of debate.
 * There is no biased opinion that I could find, given there is not much about the topic to take a side on.
 * Viewpoints are very neutral.
 * No minority or fringe points discussed
 * Nothing persuasive

Sources and References


 * Facts are backed up by sources
 * Sources are thorough
 * Sources are current minus some from the construction in 2006-7, but still accurate.
 * Sources are from a wide source of different authors, all trustworthy.
 * Most sources given seem to have much more accurate and wider variety.
 * Links work

Organization and Writing


 * Article is easy to read and well written.
 * Article doesn't have grammar or spelling errors
 * Article is well organized and reads in an informative direction

Talk Page Discussion


 * The talk page is mostly surrounding the articles organization, visuals, and spacing between paragraphs.
 * Article was rated well: Very accurate and descriptive
 * More detail on dates is discussed here

Overall Impression:


 * Article is accurate and informative
 * Strengths include sources and organization.
 * More visuals could help improve
 * Article is well developed