User:Jnelso95/Mather Tower/Grantloseke Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jnelso95


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Jnelso95/Mather Tower


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Mather Tower

Lead
The lead section does have an introductory sentence that concisely describes the article's topic, and the lead is concise, but it does not reflect the new content that was added. It has information that is not present in the article, instead of describing the major sections of the article. The lead section should be updated.

Content
The content is relevant because it explains the structure and architecture of the Mather Tower. The content is up to date, and it does not contain any equity gaps. The only missing content is some details that was mentioned in the lead section.

Tone and Balance
The content of this article is neutral. No biased claims, persuasion, or overrepresented/underrepresented content.

Sources and References
All content is backed up by secondary sources. The sources are thorough, and the content has accurate reflections on the cited sources. Some sources are current, and some date back to the 2000s, ranging from 2006 to 2020. The articles are written by different authors. However, some sources can be improved, as some came from encyclopedia articles, and other basic sources. All the links work.

Organization
The content is well-written, as it is concise (two paragraphs), and understandable. No spelling or grammar errors were found. However the content should be broken down to two sections instead of one, having a section just on architecture, and a section just on structure.

Images and media
The article contains an image on the architecture of the Mather Tower that is well-captioned. The image is visually appealing, and it follows the copyrighting regulations.

Overall Impressions
The quality of the article is improved, as it explains the architecture and structure of the Mather Tower more in depth. The strengths, is having a sufficient amount of detail on two particular sections, not use several sections with little detail. The content can be improved, by incorporating the content into the lead section, and adding content mentioned in the lead section that was not mentioned.