User:Jneyyan/Microcarrier/Alib2022 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Jneyyan


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jneyyan/Microcarrier?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Microcarrier

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

Some areas of the lead were more specific than they need to (the first paragraph in the lead) but it is still good information so maybe it is just not meant for the lead.

I don't think that the lead contains a summary of what will be talked about.

I liked the list of advantages for their use and the first definition given.

Content

Composition - I like the pros and cons of the different methods and what can be done to correct the weaknesses.

I liked the table - it gives the article more variety.

I think that the areas that are written about are well written and in depth but maybe skews the focus of the article a little (I am guilty of this in my own article as well). Maybe the sections can be broken up into some subcategories to help with this feeling?

I also think that it would add to the page visually to have an image or two so that the reader can have more visual context if you find any good ones.

I think that you have a good amount of sources.

Overall, I do think that your writing adds to the original article and it gives a well balanced view of microcarriers (ie you brought up more complex views of methods etc).