User:Jnolan27/Stony Point, New York/Patvil24 Peer Review

General info

 * Lead
 * Yes. The lead does reflect the content in the article and is concise
 * Content
 * The content was interesting and offered insight such as references to the Revolutionary War which I was completely unaware of. I was particularly fascinated by the plight of Pompey, the spy who assisted in the surprise attack on the British in Stony Point
 * Tone & Balance
 * I felt the content was neutral and non-biased. Although I did feel the author may hold a fondness for Stony Point (My guess is that is the author's home), but I don't feel this fondness was a significant factor in a bias determination.
 * Sources and References
 * There were plenty of legitimate sources, and it's clear that the sources were used to add non-biased and balanced value to the article
 * Organization
 * I found the organization of the article to be clear and concise as well as engaging. I was given new and useful information about Stony Point
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Stony Point
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Jnolan27/Stony Point, New York
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Stony Point, New York
 * Stony Point
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Jnolan27/Stony Point, New York
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Stony Point, New York
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Stony Point, New York

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)