User:Joannaberg4/sandbox

Article Evaluation
Make sure to be a critical thinker when reading information from a source and when planning to incorporate that information into your Wikipedia page.

Additionally, it is important to be critical when reading other's Wikipedia articles: is there evident collaborative effort or does it look like it was written by one person from one source or point of view? Are biases or opinions present? These might point to a less than reliable Wikipedia article. A good Wikipedia article is easy to understand, informative, includes proven/factual information from a variety of reliable sources and is neutral.

Any information taken from another source, such as a quote or statistic, should be cited. Be sure to cite reliable sources in your Wikipedia page. Additionally, when using information from a source be sure not to inadvertently plagiarism. Plagiarism includes paraphrasing from a source and should be avoided. Copyrighted things cannot be used on your Wikipedia page.

Schizophrenia Wikipedia Article
In talking about environmental factors this article makes several factors seem more causative rather than correlated. It reads initially as if cannabis use or being raised in a city will cause Schizophrenia. Instead, it should read that environmental factors, mixed with genetic and neurological components as well as stressors may lead to development of Schizophrenia but that no single environmental factor can definitively cause Schizophrenia. Additionally, schizophrenics use of nicotine is often a method to self medicate, which could potentially be expanded on with the use of the following research article: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763405000874. I also posted similar edits on the Schizophrenia article's talk page.

Article Idea
As discussed via email, I would like to do my article on bacteriotherapy, with a specific focus on using fecal transplants as a treatment for depression.

Outline of Lead Section
Bacteriotherapy currently exists as a stub article. The introductory sentence defines bacteriotherapy and fecal bacteriotherapy. I would likely reword the definition of bacteriotherapy, and then continue the introduction as follows: Bacteriotherapy is also known as fecal transplantation and is when fecal matter from a healthy donor is transferred to a recipient. Fecal transplants have shown efficacy as a treatment for depression and C. diff. Bacteriotherapy shows some success in treatment for both mental diseases (depression) as well as diseases of the microbiome (C. diff). The gut brain axis explains how bacteriotherapy can be used as treatment for depression and other mental disorders. The gut brain axis is a highly supported notion that explains bidirectional communication between the gut (intestines and their microbiota) and the brain. Some support for the gut brain axis is that many gastrointestinal disorders are comorbid with disorders such as anxiety and autism. Autism symptoms have been shown to improve with prebiotic treatments as well. Fecal transplants show changes in phenotypes of the recipients as well. In studies with mice, recipient mice have been shown to exhibit phenotypic behavior similar to the donor mouse. For example, overweight donor mice likely led to overweight recipient mice.

Contents: Depression Treatment, C. Diff Treatment, Gut Brain Axis, Autism Treatment, Phenotypes

I feel as though I should restructure this introduction to have a definition of Bacteriotherapy/fecal transplant first, followed by the gut brain axis. After the gut brain axis I think I should talk about phenotypes, depression, anxiety, and Autism. Then lastly, I think I should talk about the use of bacteriotherapy in treatment of C.diff, Depression, and Autism (which is actually probiotics but still related). One problem I find myself having is how much to talk about things such as the gut brain axis. I think its crucial to explain it so that it makes sense why fecal transplants can be used as treatments for depression, for example, but I know the focus of this page is bacteriotherapy and I don't want that to fall into the background/seem unclear. I also know I will tag these things to link them to their existing Wikipedia articles, but that doesn't feel like a good enough way to explain these connections.

Possible Topics that Need Improvement
Schizophrenia article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizophrenia). Improvement: discuss more neurological factors (i.e. disordered pyramidal neurons, which become disordered during fetal development) and further elucidate that it has no singular known cause but multiple correlations. Bacteriotherapy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bacteriotherapy). Improvement: this is a stub article and therefore the entire article needs to be written to further explain what it is and what it can be useful for. Major Depressive Disorder (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_depressive_disorder). Improvement: discuss fecal transplant as possible treatment.

Potential Articles
Bacteriotherapy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bacteriotherapy): write pretty much the entire article and discuss it's implication as treatment in both physical and mental illness. Bajor Depressive Disorder (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_depressive_disorder): writing about fecal transplants as a possible treatment is possible, but seems to narrow/specific to focus on only that. Therefore, I think writing about bacteriotherapy will be the best article to write.

Planned Contributions to Bacteriotherapy Article
Since this article only has a sentence I will be contributing most of the article. I first want to explain what bacteriotherapy is. I want to describe its relation to physical illness (c. diff) which is a direct relation and then use the gut brain axis to explain how it is related to mental illness such as depression, anxiety and Autism. Lastly, I want to explain how bacteriotherapy is used as treatment for these things (specifically depression, and C.diff) probably by citing literature about how phenotype of a recipient mouse mimics the donor mouse's phenotype.

Bacteriotherapy
Bacteriotherapy is the purposeful use of bacteria or their products in treating an illness. Forms of bacteriotherapy include the use of probiotics, microorganisms that provide health benefits when consumed; fecal matter transplants (FMT) /intestinal microbiota transplant (IMT), the transfer of gut microorganisms from the fecal matter of healthy donors to recipient patients to restore microbiota; or synbiotics which combine prebiotics, indigestible ingredients that promote growth of beneficial microorganisms, and probiotics. Through these methods, the gut microbiota, the community of 300-500 microorganism species that live in the digestive tract of animals aiding in digestion, energy storage, immune function and protection against pathogens, can be recolonized with favorable bacteria, which in turn has therapeutic effects. FMT is being used as a new and effective treatment for C. diff infections, a gastrointestinal disease in which Clostridium difficile colonizes the gut of an organism disrupting microbial balance and causing diarrhea that can potentially be deadly. Bacteriotherapy has also begun to be used in the treatment of mental disorders such as depression, anxiety, and Autism Spectrum Disorder. Recolonization of gut flora can be used effectively in the treatment of mental disorders because of the existence of the gut-brain axis, the bidirectional route of communication between the brain and the gut, specifically the gut microbiota.

Fecal Matter Transplant (FMT)
Fecal Matter Transplant (FMT) was first documented in humans in 1958. The FDA considers FMT a suitable treatment for select patients with C. diff, specifically when standard treatment has failed. It shows a 90% success rate in clinical trials for recurrent C. diff infections. For other illness, it is considered an experimental treatment and should only be done within a research program. The process of FMT involves injecting a liquid suspension of healthy stool into the gastrointestinal tract of a patient. FMT does not require immunological matching or suppression (unlike typical organ transplants). FMT can be performed through nasogastric intubation, nasojejunal intubation, nasoduodenal intubation, upper tract endoscopy, retention enema, gentle rectal enema, or colonoscopy. Research is currently being done to see if FMT can be encapsulated and taken orally as a pill. FMT is a novel treatment, with few complications known thus far. Minor side effects have been reported as mild diarrhea, cramping, abdominal pain, changes in bowel movements, upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, IBS symptoms (infectious or not), constipation, and irritable colon. There is little known about the possible long-term risk of transmitting an autoimmune disease. Protocols vary with regard to quantity of stool being transplanted and method of infusion. Fresh unfrozen stool samples are more commonly used than frozen samples. The transplant of unfrozen sample is preferably completed within 6 hours. Resolution and relapse rates also differ based on the diluents used to make FMT solutions (water, saline, yogurt, milk or saline with psyllium). Resolution rates increased with increased volume and relapse rates increased with decreased mass of FMT. Further research on FMT is required to directly compare routes of administration, optimal protocol for infusions, and ideal amounts of fecal matter required. Researchers suggest using a large sample size in order to yield statistically significant results.

FMT Donation
Donors must have refrained from antibiotic usage for as little as 2 months or up to 6 months prior to donating stool. Additionally, donors must not have any history of gastrointestinal disease. Blood tests commonly screen donors for hepatitis A, B and C, HIV and syphilis. Stool tests may include CD toxin, ova, and parasites. 1 donor provides feces for more than 1 patient. Fresh donations should be provided on the day of treatment. Donors related to recipients typically show higher resolution rates (93%) compared to unrelated donors (84%).

C. diff
C. diff infections typically result from the use of broad spectrum antibiotics that alter the microbiota balance, allowing C. diff to colonize. Typical treatment of C. diff with antibiotics, can further disrupt the microbiome of the gut often leading to a cyclical recurrence of C. diff with 35% of patients experiencing recurrence, additionally antibiotic resistance is a growing problem. Replacing typical antibiotic treatments with novel FMT treatment restores healthy microbiota and resolves symptoms. FMT restores a healthy balance of bacteria within a gut previously disrupted by C. diff colonization and antibiotic usage. FMT colonizes the gut with microbiota that suppress C. diff, rebuilds a stable microbiome, and restores function. The microbiota of treated patients typically resembles that of the donor after transplantation. In a systematic review of the use of FMT to treat C. diff infections (mostly C. diff associated diarrhea), 536 patients age 4-77 were reviewed, with elderly patients predominating. Most patients had previously received antibiotics before having repeated relapses. 87% of patient’s diarrhea resolved after first FMT treatment. Diarrhea resolution rates differed based on injection: 81% resolution when injected in the stomach, 86% when injected into the duodenum/jejunum (the first two parts of the small intestine), 93% success upon transfer by colonoscopy into the cecum (pouch at the junction of the small and large intestine)/ascending colon, 84% when inserted into the distal colon. Upon resolution of diarrhea, C. diff toxin tests were found negative. Another systematic review of 317 patients age 2-95, (average of 53 years) showed resolution of C. diff 92% of the time after treatment by FMT. Stool transplants were typically greater than or equal to 200 mL. 89% showed resolution after 1 treatment. Infusion by gastroscopic/nasojejunal tube showed the lowest resolution rates at 76%.

Administration Methods for C. diff
Administration via colonoscopy showed highest rates of successful clearance of C. diff associated diarrhea, indicating that the direct deliverance of healthy bacteria to the site where the majority of C. diff is established is the most successful therapeutic avenue. Additional benefits of colonoscopy are recolonization with favorable bacteria, bowel cleaning to rid residual C. diff spores, injection of a larger volume of stool sample than other methods and it allows visualization of the colon to rule out other disease. Upper endoscopy and nasogastric tubes are commonly used to avoid performing an endoscopy through an inflamed colon where there is a small risk of perforation. Additionally, endoscopy is a slow procedure; however, the disadvantages of the upper endoscopy and nasogastric tube methods are that the sample cannot be inserted directly into the C. diff affected site in the colon and the sample may be degraded before reaching the colon—accounting for its lower resolution rate. Enema is a less expensive and less invasive option. Administration routes are typically decided on a case-by-case basis and account for some differences in resolution and relapse rates.

Mental Illness: Depression/Anxiety
There are high levels of comorbidity between some mental disorders and gastrointestinal disturbances. This provides support for the existence gut-brain-axis, in which microbiota of the gut can influence brain development, function, and behavior, and emphasizes its role in mental illness, making FMT a plausible therapeutic avenue for some mental illness. Microbiota modulate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis (HPA axis), which controls reactions to stress and regulates digestion, immune system, mood, and emotions. Additionally, microbiota can directly impact the central nervous system (CNS), as studies have shown that bacteria in the gut can activate stress response through the vagus nerve, a cranial nerve responsible for interactions with the digestive tract. Evidence suggests that while stress can impact the composition of the microbiome, the microbiome also has an impact on stress response and behavior. Research on FMT has shown that upon transfer of fecal matter from a donor to a germ-free recipient, animals that have no microorganisms living in them, the recipient begins to mimic the phenotype, observable characteristics, of the donor. In experiments with mice, an obese donor led the recipient mouse to adopt an obese phenotype, while an underweight donor led to the adoption of an underweight phenotype in the recipient. It is thought that this mechanism explains why FMT is an effective treatment for depression and anxiety, as well as obesity. The microbiome of depressed people has been found to show decreased richness and diversity. Specifically, lactobacillus and bifidobacterial have been identified as having roles in modulating depression and anxiety behaviors. When fecal matter is transferred from depressed mice to microbiota depleted mice, behavioral exams show anhedonia, a symptom of depression; studies have also found that in a microbiome transfer from a stressed animal to a control, the control recipient also exhibits anxious behaviors proving that some depression and anxiety phenotypes are dependent on the gut microbiome, and therefore transferrable. The identification of the microbiome as having a causal role in depression and anxiety, as well as the ability to transfer depressive or anxiety symptoms from a depressed donor to a recipient makes the reverse, FMT from a healthy donor to a depressed or anxious patient, a valid experimental treatment for depression.

Mental Illness: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
The gut microbiome has been implicated in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) due to its high comorbidity with gastrointestinal problems correlating with severity of ASD. Mouse models of ASD show a link between abnormal metabolites in the gut and behavior. A clinical trial of 18 ASD children undergoing 2-week antibiotic treatment, bowel cleanse, followed by extended FMT showed an 80% reduction of gastrointestinal symptoms. Behavioral ASD symptoms also showed significant improvement that persisted up to 8 weeks after treatment ended. These changes are attributed to colonization of donor microbiota and beneficial changes in the gut environment.

Probiotics
Probiotics are living bacteria or fungi that confer health benefits. They have 3 mechanisms of therapeutic effect: antimicrobial effects, strengthening lining of the intestines, and immune modulation. These mechanisms help alter and diversify gut flora to benefit overall health. The antimicrobial effect helps prevent the growth of bacteria that cause illness. Probiotics also help strengthen tight junctions, multiprotein complexes lining the intestines (as well as other organs and regions of the body) to prevent passage of materials. Leaky gut is the term used when tight junctions of the intestines are disrupted and bacteria can exit the intestines. Leaky gut is implicated in many gastrointestinal disorders. Probiotics stimulate production of a protein that maintains the strength of the intestinal barrier and have beneficial effects on local and systemic immune system responses.

Gastrointestinal Disorders
Probiotics have been used in treatment or prevention of C. diff, irritable bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, prevention of radiation or chemotherapy induced sequelae, necrotizing enterocolitis, hepatic encephalopathy, and atopic dermatitis. Success in treatment depends on whether single or mixed strains are administered, dose, and specific bacterial species. Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium are the most commonly used probiotic strains.

Mental Illness: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
Use of probiotics in psychological states and autism is currently being studied and has shown that probiotics may influence psychological states. Probiotics have been used to transfer neurochemicals such as GABA. There is evidence that disruption of the microbiome may promote overproduction of clostridium tetani, a neurotoxin producing bacteria that may contribute to symbols of autism. One case study on a 12-year-old boy with ASD, severe cognitive disability, and celiac disease who received probiotic treatment for celiac showed an unexpected improvement in autistic core symptoms that persisted 4 months after treatment. Administration of an Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) showed a 3-point decrease in score (i.e. an improvement in core autistic symptoms) in the social affect domain. ADOS scores are typically consistent measures of autism severity, and change is unlikely. Microbiota reports consistently show significant differences in the gut of autistic patients compared to non-autistic. Ongoing research investigating probiotic use for ASD treatment is required to determine the efficacy of probiotics in reducing symptoms of ASD, and the correlation between probiotics, gut microbiota, and ASD symptoms. In studies with mice, probiotic treatment reduced anxiety and depressive behaviors, reversed the impact of maternal separation on depressive behaviors, reversed inflammatory induced and parasite induced anxiety behaviors. This evidence suggests that probiotic treatment has antidepressant and anxiolytic effects.

Synbiotics
Synbiotics contain both prebiotics and probiotics. Combining prebiotics with probiotics improves survival and activity of probiotic bacterial species. In synbiotics, prebiotics and probiotics work synergistically to provide a combined benefit beyond what either could confer independently. Synbiotics have shown positive effects on obesity, diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants, and hepatic encephalopathy. Synbiotics can be used both as preventative measures and therapeutic treatments.