User:Jocfitzgerald/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Aesthetics

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it was the first one I saw that caught my attention.

Evaluate the article
In the lead section of the article the author is concise and clear about what the topic is and contains a table of contents. The material that the author uses is relevant and up to date. Also the article goes over one of Wikipedia's equity gaps. The author uses a neutral viewpoint throughout the whole article, containing only facts and evidence the author found through strong, reliable sources. The author covers a lot about different subjects within aesthetics, each use different, thorough sources. Which are working and up to date. I think this is a very good written article, although it is a lot of information. I would find myself getting lost in the reading, but it was very useful and applicable information. I did not pick up on any major spelling or grammatical errors. The article is written in Canada English, so a few words were spelt different. The article is split up into key subjects of the topic. The author only includes two small images throughout the article. They are well-captioned and they follow the copyright guidelines. Truthfully, I don't think the images are visually appealing in the article. Which is ironic for the aesthetics topic, to not have visually appealing images. There wasn't much written within the talk page. Only one suggestion to remove quotation marks, which another editor didn't agree with. I think that this was a good article. I think that there is a lot of good and useful information in the article, which is cited from lots of different sources.I might condense some of the subjects, if I had to change something. I think it was well developed.