User:Jodosma/sandbox

29 / July / 2024 ::

Limiting the TOC's depth
By default, the TOC includes all the headings in the page, whatever their level. When an article or project page has a very large number of subsections, it may be appropriate to hide lower-level subsections from the TOC. You can specify a limit for the lowest-level section that should be displayed using, where  is the number of   signs that are used on each side of the lowest-level section header that should be displayed (e.g.   to show   but hide  ). The  parameter can also be given to  or  the same way.

Look at this

Compared with this

! Place !! Result
 * Ravens1 || Baltimore
 * Bengals2 || Cincinnati
 * Browns3 || Cleveland
 * Ravens 4 || Baltimore
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Ravens || Baltimore
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Ravens10 || Baltimore
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Ravens || Baltimore
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns15 || Cleveland
 * Ravens || Baltimore
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Ravens || Baltimore
 * Bengals20 || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Ravens || Baltimore
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Ravens25 || Baltimore
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Ravens || Baltimore
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns30 || Cleveland
 * Ravens || Baltimore
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Ravens || Baltimore
 * Bengals35 || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Ravens || Baltimore
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Ravens40 || Baltimore
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Ravens45 || Baltimore
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Ravens || Baltimore
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns50 || Cleveland
 * Ravens || Baltimore
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Ravens || Baltimore
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns30 || Cleveland
 * Ravens || Baltimore
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Ravens || Baltimore
 * Bengals35 || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Ravens || Baltimore
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Ravens40 || Baltimore
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Ravens45 || Baltimore
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Ravens || Baltimore
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns50 || Cleveland
 * Ravens || Baltimore
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Ravens45 || Baltimore
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Ravens || Baltimore
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns50 || Cleveland
 * Ravens || Baltimore
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Ravens || Baltimore
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns50 || Cleveland
 * Ravens || Baltimore
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Ravens || Baltimore
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Bengals || Cincinnati
 * Browns || Cleveland
 * Browns || Cleveland

When using a flatlist, should the first entry be capitalized. I don't think it should, unless Wiki is going to agree that the first entry carries more importance than the rest, which should never be capitalized unless they start with a proper noun, e.g. in the infobox of Paul McCartney, we have Singer-songwriter while the other occupations are not capitalized. In other articles the distinction may not be so clear. In Elton John we have, in the occupation field Musician

singer-songwriter

composer

while in the instrument field we have Vocals

piano

Does that mean that "musician" is more important than the other occupations, or that "vocals" is a more important instrument than "piano", or are "Musician" and "Vocals" just the start of sentences? Jodosma (talk) 18:11, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Text here at 50% width xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx kkkkkkkk kkkjkkkkkkkk kkkk kkkkkkk kkkkkk kkkkkkk kkkkkkkk kkkkkkk kkkkkkk k kjjjjjj hjh iiiiii kkkkkkkk kkkkkkkk kkkkkkkk yyyyyy yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy yyyyyyy yyy yyyyyyyyyyyyy yyyyyyyyyyyyy yyyyyyyyyyy yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy yyyyyyy zzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzz qqqqqqq qqqqqqq qq      qqqqqqqqq qqqq q q qqqqqqqqq qqqqqqq

colour test (for mobile display): Archery (1896): Archery at the 1896 Summer Olympics

Possible article: The Rack Pack, search Google for refs

use for line breaks

Liu Liyang for Tracklisting without multiple nbsp;

editing – something see WP:MOS

Leo Tolstoy, add info, see Ask, Tolstoy against the state etc.

For the future:
 * Read Categorization and FAQ/Categorization to see if I can help sort out the maze that is the category system.

For titles use


 * create article:
 * Prince of Wales hospice, Pontefract

see Billy Mould or Just Jack for good examples
 * Table layout using colspan and rowspan


 * Trying a sidebar

If text containing a named reference is deleted along with its definition, care should be taken to ensure no "widows" are created, i.e. other occurrences of the deleted reference elsewhere in the article that now have no definition; this results in a cite error. Either all appearances of the reference should be removed, or the definition should be moved to one of the remaining instances. The article should be checked after editing to ensure that no cite error has been created. Similarly, if text containing a list-defined reference is removed, which only has one occurrence in the main article content, the definition should also be removed otherwise a cite error will be created. Again, the article should be checked for cite errors after editing.
 * Deleting named references
 * Deleting list-defined references

leads to this: This is written in a green colour font
 * Some templates

Incorrect list defined reference removals
Hi! I hope you're enjoying Wikipedia. I noticed your edits on Article name where you removed several refs with some text. This has resulted in three cite errors on that page as you can see at the bottom of the article. This has occurred because they were list-defined references. If you remove a reference which is list-defined (and therefore has a name) and this is the only occurrence of that reference then please make sure that you go to the reflist and remove the definition. This will avoid the creation of a cite error. Incidentally those cite errors are still there as I write.

Hi! I hope you're enjoying Wikipedia. I noticed your edit on Article name where you removed a ref with some text. This has resulted in a cite error on that page as you can see at the bottom of the article. This has occurred because it was a list-defined reference. If you remove a reference which is list-defined (and therefore has a name) and this is the only occurrence of that reference then please make sure that you go to the reflist and remove the definition. This will avoid the creation of a cite error. Incidentally that cite error is still there as I write.