User:Joe M Cavanagh/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Plaga Zombie (film series)
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate - It sounded goofy and interesting. I had never thought about the Argentinian film industry, much less their horror movies.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? - Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? - Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? - No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? - Concise

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? - Yes
 * Is the content up-to-date? - Hard to say. The article mentions a film that began production in 2013 but doesn't say whatever happened to it.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? - No
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? - Not really.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? - Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? - No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? - No
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? - No

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? - As reliable as one can be when discussing Argentinian horror films.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? - Yes
 * Are the sources current? - Yes
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? - Not exactly
 * Check a few links. Do they work? - Yes

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? - Yes
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? - No
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? - Yes

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? - Yes
 * Are images well-captioned? - Yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? - Yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? - Yes

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? - No conversation, just someone asking for people to revue their edits.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? - It is C class, of interests to the projects Film/Argentine, Argentina, Horror, and Articles for Creation.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? - There is not any in substantial discussion.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? Pretty well fleshed out given the topic.
 * What are the article's strengths? - I think that it gives a good overview of a pretty obscure topic. It is detailed and well written.
 * How can the article be improved? - It could give a bit more information about each of the movies in the series, though I haven't compared it to other movie articles.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? - I think it's well developed.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: