User:Joelauria316/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Jamie Jones (DJ)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because Jamie Jones is one of my favorite DJs, I personally DJ and have noticed a huge information gap on wikipedia when it comes to artists in the electronic dance music genre.

Evaluate the article
Lead: I would classify the lead intro as very brief and weak. It is fully seven words. When I think of a good intro for a wikipedia article, I expect a small paragraph. I want to preface that Jamie Jones is not some small, niche DJ. He has millions of monthly listeners and over 700k followers on instagram.

Content: Content that is in the article is good, there is just a massive lack of content. It's only a paragraph long with lots of gaps in the years between the information.

Tone & Balance: For sure the strongest aspect of this article is its strong neutral tone and balance. Pretty easy to do considering how short it is, but there is no sense of bias in either a positive or negative way.

Sources: Very outdated. Obviously, considering he has been around in the EDM space for 10+ years there will be a good amount of old sources, but for a page that has been edited in the past year, it is quite frustrating that there are no good 'newer' sources that information is gained from.

Organization: Strong, there's only one section but that section is well-written and concise with the information it is sharing.

Images & Media: N/A. Would be such an easy add considering the amount of photos of him on the internet.

Overall Impression: There is a lot that can be done with this article. Tons of information about Jamie Jones on the internet, so I think there is much room for improvement.