User:Joeybrown8/Hydropsychidae/Corgsi05 Peer Review

General info
Joeybrown8
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Joeybrown8/Hydropsychidae - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Hydropsychidae - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Additions to the article seem to have a good start! The added content about the what the webs of the Hydropsychidae and how they can determine the condition of the stream it is built near is relevant information that adds to the article. Nothing is biased or attempts to convince the reader of something. However, there is a list of quotes from various sources that are not used for specific edits. It is also worth mentioning that Wikipedia does not allow quotes - everything needs to be paraphrased, specifically in a way that is very different from the original source. No sources are properly cited as references either - this needs to be done for all sources before anything is incorporated into the actual article. Not all of the sources can be accessed, and due to the lack of proper citations it is difficult to figure out where the information is coming from (make sure to use the citation option at the top of the page while editing! This will allow you to put a citation at the end of information to signify what source it came from and give readers easy access to the source).The sources are generally diverse but not all of them are current. There are a diverse range of sources with different authors used, and the sources that do have links provided do work. The content is overall well-written and properly organized with no grammatical or spelling errors. However, there are only 4 sentences added in total - maybe more information could be found to add to this article?

You're off to a good start, some fascinating and relevant information has been added! However, there are some things that need to be figured out with your sources, and I think some more information added could be beneficial to a well-rounded final edit to the main article.