User:Joeyslinger1/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Gardening:
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is it written neutrally? Yes
 * Does each claim have a citation? No
 * Are the citations reliable? No
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)? No


 * Sources:

Option 2

 * Sustainable Agriculture
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is it written neutrally? Yes
 * Does each claim have a citation? Yes
 * Are the citations reliable? Mostly
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)? Somewhat
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)? Somewhat


 * Sources:

Option 3

 * Article title:Subsistence Agriculture
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is it written neutrally? No
 * Does each claim have a citation? No
 * Are the citations reliable? Mostly
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)? Somewhat


 * Sources:

Option 4

 * Article title:Regenerative Agriculture
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is it written neutrally? Yes
 * Does each claim have a citation? Yes
 * Are the citations reliable? Yes
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)? No


 * Sources:

Option 5

 * Article title:Incan agriculture
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is it written neutrally? Yes
 * Does each claim have a citation? No
 * Are the citations reliable? Somewhat
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)? Yes


 * Sources: