User:Joeyslinger1/Gardening/NeuroBlast100 Peer Review

General info
User:Joeyslinger1
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Joeyslinger1/Gardening
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Gardening

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead Section

The section is very well written. It provides an all encompassing yet concise introduction to gardening. It talks about the various approaches and view towards gardening in the past and present and across cultures and while maintain neutrality and balanced coverage. The content is engaging, has great flow and clarity in that it is easy to understand as a reader, it uses simple language and references every fact.

Prehistory

Like the lead section, this section also follows a great flow of information, sentence/paragraph transitions and clarity of the facts presented. The structure of this section is presented in a somewhat chronological way that takes a reader through a visual journey of the evolution of gardening in human history. This section also touches on the external influences that played a role in shaping gardening as we know it today, such as colonialism and Indigenous practices. That being said, this section does appear to drag on, but only in the slightest. Perhaps it could benefit from sub-sectioning or condensing the material.

This section also maintains neutrality in handling such delicate topics and presents them from a strictly neutral point of view while providing a balanced coverage of all the historical influences presented. It is well cited and referenced with up to date and reliable sources. No grammatical or language errors were identified. The use of hyperlink to other related Wikipedia articles and images makes this draft a treat to read an review.