User:Johenn11/Gemmatimonas groenlandica/Ngeer20 Peer Review

General info
Johenn11
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Johenn11/Gemmatimonas_groenlandica/Ngeer20_Peer_Review?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_peer_review
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Gemmatimonas groenlandica

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

The lead is concise. I think depending on what you end up doing with the article body, an additional sentence summarizing the additional information that has been added to the article could be useful.

Content:

The content is relevant and up to date. It does appear that there are some additional articles from 2022 that mention this species. It could be beneficial to take a look at these to further enhance the content of this article.

Tone and Balance:

The tone and balance are both neutral.

Sources and references:

The article utilizes only one source, so trying to find additional papers that can add to this article is important.

Organization:

The content is well written and easy to read. Additional sections in the body would better organize the article.

Overall impressions:

I think that the contributions that were made for the article were a good start, and that they should be organized into individual sections within the article body and then more information/details for each be added.