User:John.heuver/1985 Algarrobo earthquake/Huzmir1014 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

John.heuver


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:John.heuver/1985_Algarrobo_earthquake?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * 1985 Algarrobo earthquake

Evaluate the drafted changes
This in progress sandbox is very well crafted; including a in depth article review, three new and unique additions to the original paper, and 3 credible sources. Firstly, the article evaluation is very well crafted and goes into depth on only the lack of seismological data and the specifics of the earthquake itself, but also comments on the images and tables used in the mother article. The review goes over what the article does and doesn't cover and lays a foundation for what the group is going to add. Moving on the article draft, the group has three subsections that they have created for the article: the lead, tectonic settings, and intensity. Each are in a paragraph format with the tectonic settings and intensity subsections being also embedded with sources. Excluding the lead which needs minor sourcing fixes and removal of non linked intext sourcing, the tectonics and intensity paragraphs are article ready. Finally, the references tab includes 3 credible sources and a news source which provided the three previously discussed paragraphs with amble support and evidence. The only suggestion I have is beginning on the article body with some broad ideas and a framework (can be bulleted) but other than that this group is ahead of the curve in their output so far. Cant wait to see what they come up with.

John's response
Thanks for your review! I appreciate the support. I agree the lead does need a good bit of work, Its not sufficient in opening up our article yet. I also thought our framework was solid, as with our 3 sources. The broad ideas at the beginning of the body is a good idea and one that we will certainly work to implement. Again, much appreciated.