User:John.heuver/1985 Algarrobo earthquake/Raomes Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

John.heuver


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mcoope17/1138_Aleppo_earthquake?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

In first glance, this article is very organized and has very distinct sections regarding the different topics in their article. The article evaluation, the article draft, and the bibliography are very organized and well written. The article evaluation was able to dive deep into the information that their original article provided. They were able to talk about how the article lacks deeper information but is able to provide the basic information for the event, like the location, characteristics, and description. The article draft was well organized, providing sections for the lead, tectonic settings, and intensity. All three of these sections were able to provide relevant, and specific information that successfully added to their article. The last section, the references section, was very well organized and provided reliable sources as well. Overall, this was a very successful article. They were able to organize the information given from the original articles as well as provide relevant information about their given earthquake.