User:JohnOates1/Tomah Mayfly/Renhin Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

JohnOates1


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Tomah mayfly
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Tomah mayfly

Evaluate the drafted changes
The introduction provides an overview of the species that the article is about. The first sentence talks about how rare the species is rather than what the species is, so you have to read more of the paragraph to understand what exactly the species taxonomy is. The introduction is slightly over detailed since I think that some of the information could be included elsewhere, but I don't think that is necessarily a bad thing.

The content is relevant to the topic and is up-to-date. I didn't see anything that was missing, although an image or two of the species would have been helpful.

The content added is neutral, and I don't think that it is biased towards a particular viewpoint.

The content is backed up by reliable sources of information, all cited at the bottom of the article. I believe that the content accurately reflects what the sources say. The sources are relatively current, meaning that I think more recent sources would help, but the ones that are older still contribute valuable information to the content. The links that I checked worked.

The content is well-written and clear, and the different sections make it easier to read. If possible, I would break the sections down into more paragraphs because the content looks overwhelming. I didn't find any grammatical or spelling errors.

There are no images or media, and the table that is added is relevant to and presents the taxonomy of the species in an easy-to-read way.

I believe that the article meets the notability requirements, and that there is a decent amount of sources to support what is written. The article follows the patterns of other similar articles written about specific species, and contains necessary information and headings. The article does not link to other articles.

The content within the article increases the quality of the article, and the different sections are a strength of the article. The only suggestions I have would be to break the larger paragraphs down into smaller paragraphs to make it easier to read and less overwhelming, and to add an image of the species.