User:John Cardinal

See: talk*contribs

Essays

 * I wrote an essay that compares citation methods.

John Lennon interview indexes

 * Index to Jann Wenner's Lennon Remembers, a 1970 interview with John Lennon and Yoko Ono that originally appeared in Rolling Stone magazine.
 * Index to David Sheff's All We Are Saying, a 1980 interview with Lennon and Ono that originally appeared in Playboy magazine.

Three Lennon interviews by Rolling Stone are available online:
 * 1968 Interview with Jonathan Cott (September 28, 1968, published November 23, 1968)


 * 1975 Interview with Pete Hamill (June 5, 1975)


 * 1980 Interview with Jonathan Cott (December 5, 1980, published January 22, 1981)

Don't think twice
The Paul Is Dead article describes the urban legend that McCartney died in 1966 and was replaced by a look-alike and sound-alike. A paragraph in the article describes an analysis of pre- and post-1966 photographs. The analysis was poorly done in my opinion, but that's not the funny part. The article says the people who did the analysis "concluded that it was possible that the photographs were not of the same person." (Yeah, right!) Then we read this:

They noted however, that they had not had direct access to McCartney, and that they were less certain of their conclusion than might have been the case had they been dealing with a corpse, where a more rigorous analysis would have been possible.

So, let me get this straight... the researchers want to kill McCartney in order to prove whether or not he's dead?