User:Johns9ea/Ibibio people /CourtneyPhelps Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)Johns9ea
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Johns9ea/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? No lead in sandbox
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? N/A
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? N/A
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? N/A
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? N/A

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, it adds to the culture/art of the Ilbibio. This is important because on the original wiki page it's quite depressing the lack of effort on the art section of the page.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes. From this century for the most part.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? There's lots of information about masks, are there any other types of art forms to delve deeper into as well. For example in the short depressing original page they talk about sculpture as well as some dance - some research into this might be good as well.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yep.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? not biased. no position was taken.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No viewpoints are overrepresented.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? nope.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, all sources seem correct and reliable.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes
 * Are the sources current? yes, all from this century for the most part.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yep.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Despite that they're in bullet points, yes they are all concise and organized in a way that I can get a sense of the direction they're going to take it eventually.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? All good.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? The name of the entire section could just be "Masks" since the entirety of the information shown seems to be mask related. But also, it is clever to separate it by town.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? N/A
 * Are images well-captioned? N/A
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? N/A
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? N/A

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? The information given will definitely add to the articles section on art. As said before, the original article doesn't focus much on the art section. It seems like it just focuses on the geography and religion - which in essence connects to the art as well in most African cultures.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The in depth information about masks.
 * How can the content added be improved? Items other than masks could be explored. Like sculpture and dance or perhaps clothing.